Side by side
Replicate vs Together AI
A fact-based comparison built only from each tool's verified directory profile — pricing summaries, plan availability, platforms, and stated strengths and limitations. No rankings, no sponsored placement.
| Criterion | Replicate | Together AI |
|---|---|---|
| Category | AI Deployment & Monitoring | Inference & Model Hosting |
| In one sentence | Run and deploy open-source and custom AI models through an API, paying per second of hardware or per output. | Cloud platform for running, fine-tuning and training open models on serverless APIs or rented GPUs. |
| Problem it solves | Using or deploying AI models, especially image and video models, without managing GPUs. | Running open models in production without buying and operating your own GPUs. |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Developer API | Yes — docs | Yes — docs |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Web, REST API | Web, REST API |
| Pricing (summary) | Usage-based. Public models mostly bill by hardware time (e.g. Nvidia T4 $0.81/hr, A100 80GB $5.04/hr, H100 $5.49/hr, billed per second). Some official models bill per output or token, such as flux-1.1-pro at $0.04 per image. Checked 2026-10-19 | Usage-based. Serverless models are billed per 1M tokens (for example gpt-oss-120B $0.15 / $0.60, Kimi K3 $3 / $15). Dedicated endpoints and GPU clusters are billed per GPU-hour, and fine-tuning per 1M training tokens with minimum charges. Checked 2026-10-19 |
| Strengths |
|
|
| Limitations |
|
|
How to choose
Both profiles link to the vendors' official pricing — plan details change often, so verify there before buying. Pick based on the criterion rows above that matter to your workflow, not on rankings: we don't rank tools, because the right choice depends on your needs.