Side by side
Make vs n8n
A fact-based comparison built only from each tool's verified directory profile — pricing summaries, plan availability, platforms, and stated strengths and limitations. No rankings, no sponsored placement.
| Criterion | Make | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Category | AI Workflow Builders | AI Workflow Builders |
| In one sentence | A visual automation platform for building multi-step scenarios that connect apps and AI models. | A fair-code workflow automation tool with a visual editor, code steps and AI agent nodes, available as cloud or self-hosted. |
| Problem it solves | Automating multi-step processes with branching, iteration and error handling without writing a service from scratch. | Teams need flexible automation and AI workflows without per-task pricing or sending data to a third-party cloud. |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Developer API | Yes — docs | Yes — docs |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Web, API | Web, Self-hosted (Docker/npm) |
| Pricing (summary) | A free tier covers a limited monthly operations allowance; paid plans scale by operations and add features and team controls. Verify current plans on Make's pricing page. Checked 2026-10-18 | The self-hosted Community edition is free under the Sustainable Use License. Cloud plans billed annually are Starter €20/month (2,500 executions) and Pro €50/month (10,000 executions); Business is €667/month (self-hosted, 40,000 executions) and Enterprise is custom. Checked 2026-10-19 |
| Strengths |
|
|
| Limitations |
|
|
How to choose
Both profiles link to the vendors' official pricing — plan details change often, so verify there before buying. Pick based on the criterion rows above that matter to your workflow, not on rankings: we don't rank tools, because the right choice depends on your needs.